|Rosella Machine Intelligence & Data Mining|
Finance / Credit Risk Predictive Modeling and Risk Management
Credit risk analysis (finance risk analysis, loan default risk analysis) and credit risk management is important to financial institutions which provide loans to businesses and individuals. Credit can occur for various reasons: bank mortgages (or home loans), motor vehicle purchase finances, credit card purchases, installment purchases, and so on. Credit loans and finances have risk of being defaulted or delinquent. To understand risk levels of credit users, credit providers normally collect vast amount of information on borrowers. Statistical predictive analytic techniques can be used to analyze or to determine risk levels involved on credits, finances, and loans, i.e., default risk levels. Credit risk predictive modeling using Machine Learning methods is discussed here.
Why internal credit scoring?
Personal credit scores are normally computed from information available in credit reports collected by external credit bureaus and ratings agencies. Credit scores may indicate personal financial history and current situation. However, it does not tell you exactly what constitutes a "good" score from a "bad" score. More specifically, it does not tell you the level of risk for the lending you may be considering. Furthermore, in many countries, credit rating system is not available. Internal credit scoring methods described in this page address the problem. It is noted that internal credit scoring techniques can be applied to commercial credits as well.
Credit Risk Analysis and Credit Risk Prediction
In this page, the following credit risk analysis and credit risk prediction methods are described;
Hotspot Profiling of Risky Credit Segments
Credit risk profiling (finance risk profiling) is very important. The Pareto principle suggests that 80%~90% of the credit defaults may come from 10%~20% of the lending segments. Profiling risky segments can reveal useful information for credit risk management. Credit providers often collect a vast amount of information on credit users. Information on credit users (or borrowers) often consists of dozens or even hundreds of variables, involving both categorical and numerical data with noisy information. Hotspot profiling is to identify factors or variables that best summarize risky segments.
CMSR Data Miner / Machine Learning Studio hotspot profiling tools drill-down data systematically and detect important relationships, co-factors, interactions, dependencies and associations amongst many variables and values accurately using Artificial Intelligence techniques, and generate profiles of most interesting segments. Hotspot analysis can identify profiles of high (and low) risk loans accurately through thorough systematic analysis of all available data.
Credit Risk Predictive Modeling and Credit Risk Prediction by Machine Learning
If past is any guide for predicting future events, credit risk prediction by Machine Learning is an excellent technique for credit risk management. Prediction models are developed from past historical records of credit loans, containing financial, demographic, psychographic, geographic information, etc. From the past credit information, predictive models can learn patterns of different credit default/delinquency ratios, and can be used to predict risk levels of future credit loans. It is important to note that statistical process requires a substantially large number of past historical records (or customer loans) containing useful information. Useful information is something that can be a factor that differentially affects credit default/delinquency ratios.
Credit Risk Predictive Modeling Techniques and Software Tools
CMSR Data Miner / Machine Learning Studio supports robust easy-to-use predictive modeling machine learning tools. Users can develop models with the help of intuitive model visualization tools. CMSR supports the following predictive modeling machine learning software tools;
Does Credit Risk Prediction by Machine Learning Work?
Effectiveness of predictive modeling by machine learning depends on the quality of historical data. If historical data contains information that can predict customer tendencies and behaviors, credit risk prediction by machine learning can be very effective. Otherwise reliable credit risk predictive models will be difficult to obtain. Good historical data is essential to produce good predictive models. How can you know whether your customer data contain predictive information? You need to perform variable relevancy analysis and build models and test!
If you have questions regarding predictive modeling described here, please write to us.
Credit Risk Scoring by Machine Learning - Credit Risk Predictive Models
Credit risk score is a risk rating of credit loans. It measures the level of risk of being defaulted/delinquent. The level of default/delinquency risk can be best predicted with predictive modeling using machine learning tools. Credit risk scores can be measured in terms of default/delinquency probability and/or relative numerical ratings. The following subsections outline credit risk scoring methods by AI Machine Learning;
Why Neural Network and Deep Learning?
A commonly used method used in risk prediction is regression. Regression works well if information structure is functional and simple. However it does not perform well on complex information with many categorical variables. Another commonly cited method is decision tree. Decision tree is not suitable if dependent variables have heavy skews. Credit loan data have this skew. Decision tree can work if default/delinquency rate is about, say, 30% ~ 70%. A commonly used method to overcome this problem is the boosting method which dupicates skewed data. But duplication turns outliers into statistically significant patterns, introducing bogus patterns. This is a bad approach!
This leads Neural Network and Deep Learning methods to be the choice for credit risk predictive modeling. The following figure shows a neural network model;
Neural network arranges information in nodes and weight-links as shown in the above figure. Nodes represent input/output values. Nodes are organized into layers: input layer, (optional) internal layers (normally a single layer as in the figure), and output layer. Input layer nodes accept input values. Values of output layer nodes and internal layer nodes are computed by summing up previous layer nodes multiplied by weight-links' values.
Neural network weight-links are computed in such a way that given input values, network produces certain output value(s) for output layer node(s). This process is called as network training. This is performed using past data. Neural network is a heuristic predictive system.
Bias nodes are similar to coefficients in regression. They have value 1 and tend to improve network's learning capability.
In the above chart, positive value weight-links are colored in red. Negative value weight-links are colored in blue. Colors are scaled according to absolute value ratios against the largest absolute value. Absolute value zero is colored in black. Largest absolute value is colored in pure red or blue color. The rest are scaled accordingly.
It is noted that neural network is not good at predicting unseen information. It can make very wild predictions. Thus good training data is very important. For more on neural network, please read Neural Network.
In the following sections, credit risk modeling steps are described.
Step 1: Develop Neural Network Models
Predictive models infer predictions from a set of variables called independent variables. To develop models, the first step is to analyze which variables contain predictive information through relevancy analysis. Only relevant variables are recommended to be used as independent variables. CMSR Data Miner / Machine Learning Studio provides tools for variable relevancy analysis. For more on this, please read Variable Relevancy and Factor Analysis in Predictive Modeling.
Once relevant variables are identified, (neural network) models can be configured and trained using past historical data. Neural network training is a repetitive process which may take long. Fast computer may be needed. Fully trained models should be tested using past historical data before using them. Single models can have bias and weakness. To overcome this, multiple models can be developed and combined as described in the next section.
Step 2: Combine Neural Network Models
Once models are fully trained and tested, they can be integrated to produce combined outputs such as largest (=maximum), smallest (=minimum), average, average without largest and smallest values, etc. This can be done using RME-EP (Rule-based Model Evaluation available in CMSR Data Miner / Machine Learning Studio) easily.
Testing predictive credit risk models requires data visualization tools. The following histogram shows largest(=maximum) scores and risk distribution in past historical data. "MaximumScore" represents the combined largest(=maximum) values horizontally. Vertically risk (=delinquent/defaulted) proportion (in red color) is shown. Note that the label "Risk" represents historical data which were in delinquent/defaulted state. It clearly shows that higher scores have higher proportion of risk in the past historical data. So the models are effective and useful. Note that the neural network models are trained to predict values between 0 and 1. This can be a bit higher and a bit lower value as seen in the histogram.
The following figure plots data of the above chart. "RID" (=record identifier) is used to spread data horizontally so that data can be seen easily. Vertically it shows maximum values scored by models. Red circles represent historical data records that were delinquent or defaulted. Clearly this plot shows higher the score is, higher the risk. Score 0.6 and above was all delinquent/defaulted. Score 0.4 to 0.6 also has high risk. Score 0.2 to 0.4 has medium risk. The rest has low risk.
Step 3: Risk Scores to Risk Classification
Risk scores produced by neural network and RME-EP models can be confusing to users. It will be better if they are verbalized into more easily understood vocabularies such as "Very high risk", "High risk", "Medium risk", "Low risk", etc. The above histogram clearly shows that if maximum risk score is equal or greater than 0.6, it has 100% risk. So it can be coded as "Very high risk". The next class is if maximum risk score is equal greater than 0.3, it has "High risk". The next class is if maximum risk score is equal greater than 0.2, it has "Medium risk". The rest has "Low risk". This classification produces risk distribution as in the following chart.
This chart shows how each class had risk in the past historical data. This classification is coded using an RME-EP model. You need two RME-EP models: One is to combine scores to produce maximum scores for analysis. The next model is to produce classification and to deploy.
This classification can be extended to include minimum and average risk scores. Expanded documentation of this extension can be found in MyDataSay Android Application. Download is available here MyDataSay Android App.
* Note that models and charts used in this page are produced using CMSR Data Miner / Machine Learning Studio and are based on artificially generated data. For software download, please apply CMSR Download Request.
Step 4: Deploy Models for Users
Once models are fully trained, tested and combined into RME-EP models, they are ready to deploy for customer-facing users. We provide the following deployment options;
It is noted that CMSR Data Miner / Machine Learning Studio and Web Server run on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Solaris, AIX, HP-UX.
The following figures show deployment of predictive models. The first figure
is an example of input screen on web browser. The second is an example result on
(It is important to note that your local anti-discrimination laws may bar using certain variables in your predictive models, such as gender, race, age, etc. If models are used to discriminate customers. Check your local laws.)
For more details on these modeling steps, please read;